\begin{table}[ht!]
	\centering
    \caption{$\min t_{lat}$, $\tilde{t}_{lat}$, and $\max t_{lat}$  measured with \texttt{ib\_send\_lat}. All communication went over an \gls{rc} \gls{rdma} \gls{cm} \gls{qp} and was sent with the normal \textit{send} operation. Every test contained 1000 iterations and messages that were smaller than \SI{188}{\byte} were sent inline.}\label{tab:correlation_benchmarks}
	\vspace{3mm}
	 \begin{tabular}{r | c c c c} 
	 \hlineB{3}
	 \Tstrut
          & \multicolumn{3}{c}{round-trip benchmark} & one-way benchmark
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         message size [\SI{}{\byte}] & $\min{t_{lat}}$ [\SI{}{\micro\second}] & $\tilde{t}_{lat}$ [\SI{}{\micro\second}] & $\max{t_{lat}}$ [\SI{}{\micro\second}] & $\tilde{t}_{lat}$  [\SI{}{\micro\second}]
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \hhline{=|====}
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{8}{}     & 0.80  & 0.83  & 2.37 & 0.94
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{16}{}     & 0.79  & 0.83  & 4.06 & 0.91
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{32}{}     & 0.79  & 0.82  & 4.29 & 0.91
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{64}{}     & 0.82  & 0.86  & 2.20 & 1.00
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{128}{}     & 0.86  & 0.90  & 1.73 & 1.01
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{256}{}     & 1.24  & 1.30  & 2.05 & 1.36
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{512}{}     & 1.31  & 1.35  & 2.56 & 1.42
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{1024}{}     & 1.45  & 1.49  & 2.78 & 1.63
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{2048}{}     & 1.71  & 1.75  & 2.87 & 2.29
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{4096}{}     & 2.22  & 2.27  & 2.87 & 2.93
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{8192}{}     & 2.55  & 2.61  & 3.97 & 3.62
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{16384}{}     & 3.14  & 3.21  & 4.54 & 4.58
     \Bstrut
     \\
	 \Tstrut
         \SI{32768}{}     & 4.48  & 4.59  & 5.78 & 5.96
     \Bstrut
     \\
	\hlineB{3}
	\end{tabular}
\end{table}
