masters-thesis/tables/timer_comparison.tex

27 lines
1.1 KiB
TeX

\begin{table}[ht!]
\centering
\caption{Comparison of the performance of timer functions. All tests were performed with a rate of \SI{100}{\kilo\hertz}, with 10 64-bit floating-point numbers per sample, \gls{rc} as service type, and with the InfiniBand node-type as node-type under test. Every test contains \SI{250000}{} samples.}
\vspace{3mm}
\label{tab:timer_comparison}
\begin{tabular}{c | l l}
\hlineB{3}
\Tstrut
\textbf{optimized environment} & \multicolumn{2}{c}{\textbf{missed samples}}
\Bstrut
\\
\Tstrut
& \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{\texttt{timerfd}}} & \multicolumn{1}{c}{\textbf{\gls{tsc}}} \\
\hhline{=|==}
\Tstrut
\NO & $\frac{12085}{250000}\cdot\SI{100}{\percent} = \SI{4.83}{\percent}$ & $\frac{3035}{250000}\cdot\SI{100}{\percent} = \SI{1.21}{\percent}$
\Bstrutlarger
\\
\Tstrut
\OK & $\frac{1692}{250000}\cdot\SI{100}{\percent} = \SI{0.68}{\percent}$ & \greencell{$\frac{1244}{250000}\cdot\SI{100}{\percent} = \SI{0.50}{\percent}$}
\Bstrutlarger
\\
\hlineB{3}
\end{tabular}
\end{table}